C# Linq延迟查询的执行实例代码
C# Linq延迟查询
在定义linq查询表达式时,查询是不会执行,查询会在迭代数据项时运行。它使用yield return 语句返回谓词为true的元素。
var names = new List<string> { "Nino", "Alberto", "Juan", "Mike", "Phil" };
var namesWithJ = from n in names
where n.StartsWith("J")
orderby n
select n;
Console.WriteLine("First iteration");
foreach (string name in namesWithJ)
{
Console.WriteLine(name);
}
Console.WriteLine();
names.Add("John");
names.Add("Jim");
names.Add("Jack");
names.Add("Denny");
Console.WriteLine("Second iteration");
foreach (string name in namesWithJ)
{
Console.WriteLine(name);
}
运行结果为
First iteration
JuanSecond iteration
Jack
Jim
John
Juan
从执行结果可以看出,当在定义namesWithJ时并不会执行,而是在执行每个foreach语句时进行,所以后面增加的“John”、“Jim”、“Jack”和“Denny”在第二次迭代时也会参与进来。
ToArray()、ToList()等方法可以改变这个操作,把namesWithJ的定义语句修改为
var namesWithJ = (from n in names
where n.StartsWith("J")
orderby n
select n).ToList();
运行结果为
First iteration
JuanSecond iteration
Juan
在日常工作中,我们常会使用 datas.Where(x=>x.XX == XXX).FirstOrDefault() 和 datas.FirstOrDefault(x=>x.XX == XXX),其实这两种写法性能是等效的,如果真的要在性能上分个高低,请见下面
C# Linq.FirstOrDefault、Linq.Where、Linq.AsParallel、List.Exists、List.Find、Dictionar.TryGetValue、HashSet.Contains 性能的比较
今天我们来比较一下集合检索方法性能更优问题,测试代码
public class Entity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int No { get; set; }
public string Col1 { get; set; }
public string Col2 { get; set; }
public string Col3 { get; set; }
public string Col4 { get; set; }
public string Col5 { get; set; }
public string Col6 { get; set; }
public string Col7 { get; set; }
public string Col8 { get; set; }
public string Col9 { get; set; }
public string Col10 { get; set; }
}
static void TestFindVelocity(int totalDataCount, int executeCount)
{
#region 构造数据
List<Entity> datas = new List<Entity>();
for (int i = 0; i < totalDataCount; i++)
{
var item = new Entity
{
No = i + 1,
Col1 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col2 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col3 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col4 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col5 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col6 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col7 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col8 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col9 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
Col10 = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"),
};
datas.Add(item);
}
#endregion
var dicDatas = datas.ToDictionary(x => x.No);
var hashSetDatas = datas.ConvertAll<Tuple<int, int>>(x => new Tuple<int, int>(x.No, x.No + 1000)).ToHashSet();
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
Random random = new Random();
Entity searchResult = null;
bool searchResultBool = false;
// 每次查询索引
List<int> indexs = Enumerable.Range(1, executeCount).Select(x => random.Next(1, totalDataCount)).ToList();
sw.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
searchResult = datas.FirstOrDefault(x => x.No == indexs[i]);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"list FirstOrDefault 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
searchResult = datas.Where(x => x.No == indexs[i]).First();
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"list Where+First 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
searchResultBool = datas.Exists(x => x.No == indexs[i]);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"list Exist 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
searchResult = datas.Find(x => x.No == indexs[i]);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"list Find 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
dicDatas.TryGetValue(indexs[i], out searchResult);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"dictionary TryGetValue 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < executeCount; i++)
{
searchResultBool = hashSetDatas.Contains(new Tuple<int, int>(indexs[i], indexs[i] + 1000));
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine($"Hashset contains 耗时:{sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
}
结果
(集合数量,测试次数) | Linq.FirstOrDefault | Linq.Where+First | List.Exists | List.Find | Dictionary.TryGetValue | HashSet.Contains |
(100, 5000000) |
4544 | 3521 | 1992 | 1872 | 66 | 924 |
(1000, 5000000) |
41751 | 29417 | 20631 | 19490 | 70 | 869 |
(10000, 5000000) |
466918 | 397425 | 276409 | 281647 | 85 | 946 |
(50000, 5000) |
6292 | 4602 | 4252 | 3559 | 0 | 2 |
(500000, 5000) |
56988 | 55568 | 48423 | 48395 | 1 | 5 |
应避免错误写法是 datas.Where(x=>x.XX == XXX).ToList()[0]
。
总结
到此这篇关于C# Linq延迟查询的执行的文章就介绍到这了,更多相关C# Linq延迟查询内容请搜索编程网以前的文章或继续浏览下面的相关文章希望大家以后多多支持编程网!
免责声明:
① 本站未注明“稿件来源”的信息均来自网络整理。其文字、图片和音视频稿件的所属权归原作者所有。本站收集整理出于非商业性的教育和科研之目的,并不意味着本站赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。仅作为临时的测试数据,供内部测试之用。本站并未授权任何人以任何方式主动获取本站任何信息。
② 本站未注明“稿件来源”的临时测试数据将在测试完成后最终做删除处理。有问题或投稿请发送至: 邮箱/279061341@qq.com QQ/279061341